Dr. Dr. Jens Holst, international consultant - health expert

Sie sind hier: » Publikationen / Publications » Fachpublikationen / Technical publications » Global health

Global health

18.08.2022: Global health and health security
Conflicting concepts for achieving stability through health?
Global health is high on the international political agenda and has played an important role at recent summit meetings of international forums such as the ‘Group of 7’ (G7) and the ‘Group of 20’ (G20). The increasing political importance of global health and the attention it receives on the international stage is long overdue from the point of view of public health and health policy. The prevailing global health discourse, however, often fails to fulfil the claim of universalism implicitly associated with the term ‘global’. Moreover, it tends to neglect the requirements of a comprehensive transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary understanding of health policy. In fact, there is a large discrepancy between the current state of knowledge and global health policy practice. Global health policies are increasingly determined by foreign-policy priorities and security concerns, and security frequently features as the contextual framework in political health and foreign-policy documents. The dominant security discourse is problematic because security-oriented policies focus on safeguarding the status quo, however inequitable and unfair it may be, instead of pushing for social balance and integration across national borders. This threatens to undermine what politics should be geared towards: the rights and legal entitlements of people, as laid down in human rights and in the WHO constitution. Please find the Paper by Jens Holst and Oliver Razum publiched online in Global Health Action on March 8, 2022 here. Text lesen
Jens Holst and Oliver Razum
19.04.2022: Biomedical Perspective: Critical Assessment of an Outdated Concep
The concept of biomedicine stems from Robert Koch's theory that diseases are caused by pathogens or other factors, and is based on the premise of a simple cause-and-effect relationship between measurable pathophysiological triggers and disease phenomena. The biomedical perspective guides health care and clinical practice worldwide, but has obvious limitations in the case of non-communicable and mental diseases. It also ignores the social determinants of health and illness, and thus important findings from health sciences research. At the same time, the dominance of the biomedical perspective is growing worldwide, not least due to the management of epidemics and pandemics and the expansion of genetic and new molecular biological methods. Reducing health and disease to biological factors tends to promote the medicalisation of social problems and individual lifestyles. Models that primarily consider organic-pathophysiological causes of chronic-degenerative diseases offer only limited approaches for prevention and health counselling. Even in medical secondary and tertiary prevention, potentially promising behavioural changes through patient counselling and education fall short if they do not sufficiently address environmental prevention. Text lesen
Jens Holst
09.03.2022: The growing hype of global health security
ACADEMIA | Letters
The importance and acceptance of health security has increased considerably in recent decades and especially since the outbreak of the CoV-SARS-2 pandemic in 2020. The quest for security is perfectly understandable in an increasingly inequitable, unstable and disjointed world. Who wouldn’t be in favour of more security in times of growing uncertainty? But a closer look shows that things are more complicated than that. It remains unclear what is meant by security, who defines security and how security is to be created. Text lesen
17.06.2021: Corona treibt den Globus um
Thema des Monats
Covid-19 lässt sich nur weltweit überwinden. Dabei helfen funktionierende Sozialsysteme und eine gerechte Impfstoff-Verteilung. Dem stehen jedoch häufig nationale und wirtschaftliche Interessen entgegen, beklagt Gesundheitswissenschaftler Prof. Dr. Dr. Jens Holst in der Juni-Ausgabe des Magazin Gesundheit und Gesellschaft (G&G) des AOK-Bundesverbands. Die Corona-Pandemie habe zwar nachdrücklich gezeigt, wie global Gesundheit mittlerweile ist: Das Virus verbreitete sich in Windeseile von der chinesischen Millionenstadt Wuhan über den gesamten Globus und folgte dabei den Spuren des Welthandels, sparte keinen Kontinent aus und führte vielerorts zu bisher unbekannten Maßnahmen. Nicht flächendeckend scheint sich allerdings die Erkenntnis durchgesetzt zu haben, dass Pandemien als globales Problem globale Antworten erfordern. Das macht Global Health und die sich daraus ergebenden politischen Maßnahmen heute wichtiger denn je. Text lesen
Jens Holst
05.11.2020: COVID-19: Besondere Herausforderungen an Public Health in Theorie und Praxis
COVID-19: Special Challenges for Theoretical and Practical Public Health
Die COVID-19-Pandemie stellt die theoretische und praktische Public Health vor besondere Herausforderungen. Ganz im Sinne von "Old Public Health" bestimmten nahezu ausschließlich von Virolog*innen und Epidemiolog*innen die Debatte, wobei letztere nicht immer grundlegende wissenschaftliche Anforderungen erfüllten. "New Public Health" mit ihrem interdisziplinären und komplexen Ansatz konnten sich längere Zeit nicht spürbar in die COVID-19-Debatte einbringen. Aber biotechnologisch-medizinische Lösungen allein werden nicht für eine nachhaltige Bewältigung der Pandemie ausreichen, darauf macht Jens Holst in seinem Beitrag in der Fachzeitschrift "Das Gesundheitswesen" aufmerksam. Es braucht eine umfassende Politik, die auch die gesellschaftlichen Bedingungen thematisiert. Text lesen
Jens Holst
04.08.2020: The world expects effective global health interventions: Can global health deliver?
COVID-19: Chance or threat for global health?
The COVID-19 crisis offers unique challenges and opportunities for global health. The initial management of the pandemic was dominated by virologists, supported by epidemiologists who did not always meet indispensable scientific requirements. Interdisciplinary and complex global health concerns and expertise, however, did not have tangible impact on the COVID-19 debate, and even less on the strategies to contain the pandemic. As an explicitly political concept global health must safeguard its broad socio-political approach and counteract all tendency towards biomedical reductionism. Global health is universal and goes beyond health security. Above medical and biotechnological solutions, it requires the consideration of both downstream and upstream determinants of health such as the political, economic, ecological and social conditions that led to the crisis. Text lesen
Jens Holst
15.07.2020: When the world depends on effective public health intervention – and public health does not deliver
Public Health vis-vis the COVID-19 pandemic
In view of the COVID-19 challenge, analysists cannot agree more with the world’s dependence on "effective public-health interventions" as stated by José Martín Moreno in the editorial to this edition of the South East-rn European Journal of Public Health (1). However, the long-term outcome and the effect of the COVID-19 crisis on Public Health - as well as on Global Health - remain uncertain. Instead of strengthening Public Health, which can be seen the national break-down of Global Health, the current handling of the pandemic worldwide rather threatens to become a challenge for Public Health. The paper was published on May 23, 2020, in the South Eastern Journal of Public Health: Holst J. When the world depends on effective public health intervention – and public health does not deliver (Editorial). SEEJPH 2020, posted: 23 May 2020. DOI: 10.4119/seejph-3469 Text lesen
Jens Holst
08.05.2020: Global Health – emergence, hegemonic trends and biomedical reductionism
Analysis of definitions, meanings and implications of Global Health
"Global Health" goes beyond the territorial meaning of "global", connects local and global, and refers to an explicitly political concept. Global Health regards health as a rights-based, universal good; it takes into account social inequalities, power asymmetries, the uneven distribution of resources and governance challenges. Thus, it represents the necessary continuance of Public Health in the face of diverse and ubiquitous global challenges. A growing number of international players, however, focus on public-private partnerships and privatisation and tend to promote biomedical reductionism through predominantly technological solutions. Moreover, the predominant Global Health concept reflects the inherited hegemony of the Global North. It takes insufficient account of the global burden of disease, which is mainly characterised by non-communicable conditions, and the underlying social determinants of health. Beyond resilience and epidemiological preparedness for preventing cross-border disease threats, Global Health must focus on the social, economic and political determinants of health. Biomedical and technocratic reductionism might be justified in times of acute health crises but entails the risk of selective access to health care. Consistent health-in-all policies are required for ensuring Health for All and sustainably reducing health inequalities within and among countries. Global Health must first and foremost pursue the enforcement of the universal right to health and contribute to overcoming global hegemony. Text lesen
Jens Holst
14.05.2019: Die unterschätzte Bedeutung der sozialen Determinanten von Gesundheit
Empfehlungen für die neue Global-Health-Strategie der Bundesregierung
Zwei Beiträge von Jens Holst im Namen der Deutschen Plattform für Globale Gesundheit fordern die stärkere Berücksichtigung gesellschaftlicher Einflussfaktoren in der globalen Gesundheitspolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die neue Strategie der Bundesregierung muss gezielt und bewusst alle Faktoren außerhalb von Human- und Tiermedizin, One Health, Pharmazie und Technologie angemessen berücksichtigen und sich explizit für eine Health-in-All-Politik einsetzen. Die Fokussierung auf gesundheitliche Bedrohungspotenziale und technologische Lösungen greift zu kurz, und die Unterstützung und wachsende Bedeutung der Global Player aus Wirtschaft und Philanthropie durch die Bundesregierung bringt die Gefahr mit sich, das private Prioritäten und Verwertungsinteressen die Gesundheit auf der Welt von einem Menschenrecht in eine Ware verwandeln. Text lesen
Jens Holst
12.05.2019: Global Health: Öffentliche Gesundheit in Theorie und Praxis
„Global Health" steht weit oben auf der internationalen politischen Agenda. Dazu hat auch die Bundesregierung unter Kanzlerin Angela Merkel (CDU) beigetragen. Aus gesundheitswissenschaftlicher und -politischer Sicht ist diese Entwicklung so überfällig wie begrüßenswert. Allerdings weist das gängige Verständnis von Global Health Schwächen auf und wird den komplexen Herausforderungen nur teilweise gerecht. Vor allem mangelt es an der konsequenten Umsetzung der globalen Ansätze in der heimischen Politik. Letztlich ist Global Health die folgerichtige Weiterentwicklung von Public Health in der globalisierten Welt. Text lesen
Jens Holst
<< 1 2 3 >>